|
Security Council and EU foreign policy envoy
cannot pick and choose
28-02-2007
By D.S. Baloch
Dust is settling in the
dusty city of Dozaap (ZAHEDAN), capital of Western Balochistan and most
volatile part of Iran, home to
Baloch
that regard Persian rule unjust. After Jondullah bombed the bus that
transported revolutionary guard to work. Soon after bombing UN Security
Council issued a statement condemning the action of Jondullah (sc/8957 dated
15th February 2007).
The European Union Foreign policy envoy followed suit. For justice to
prevail one expects that terrorist and causes of terrorists should be
condemned with one breath. So does the European Union consent to state
terrorism?
What if the state
legitimates use of force in order to commit genocide?
Iranian forces and their Shia allies within Balochistan are about to commit
genocide, and Baloch cleansing, they are encouraged by ill thought of
Security Council and European Union Foreign policy envoy.
Shahryari Iranian lawmaker said” Baloch are not Iranian and they obtained
Iranian nationality by deception we (law maker) should kick them out of Iran
they (Baloch) he said have no love for Iran”.
On
15th February a man by name of Nasrullah Shanbezhai was arrested by Iranian
security forces and put on show trial in TV and hanged 4 day later.
This trial would not concern European Union Foreign policy envoy, what about
UN Security Council, this is the most ridiculous cowboy trial ever one could
imagine.
If the man was terrorist which is what the Iranian regime wants us to
believe than he was a secret asset in the war against Jondullah. The regime
would not hang him within 4 days after his arrest. Who ever arbitrate this
show they knew that this man was innocent.
Mr. Ban KI-Moon Secretary
General should bring forward new motion in order to please dictators, as
European Union is so desperate to please the Iranian regime. UN and European
Union cannot pick and choose. Did the news of the public hanging arrive late
to UN and EU attention, or is it that crimes committed by a state against
one group acceptable?
As long as crimes are
committed by the state they would not be constituted as a crime. What about
the victims?
State of Iran failed to provide the five basic values of a state; security,
freedom, order, justice, and welfare.
Iran
is not a state that rules by consent, this is Islamic justice, where should
one search for fault. Islamic moral or corrupt culture?
This is not justice, it is mob verdict. These shows create resentment
against state, wherever there is injustice there will be struggle. Condemn
it or Condone it the choice is yours.
D.S. Baloch
|