
Mr Peter Burian
President of The Security Council
United Nations
18th February 2007
New-York
USA
Re: Security Council’s Press Statement No.
SC/8957 dated 15th February 2007
Dear Mr President
First of all let us clarify from the onset that Balochistan United Front of
Iran, as a political organisation rejects all forms of violence. We neither
subscribe nor condone violence. Indeed the raison d'être for the formation of
Balochistan United Front of Iran is to echo the voice of peaceful but oppressed
Baloch people who are themselves victims of the State violence.
We understand the fact that United Nations is a body formed by the
representatives of governments. Many of these governments do democratically
represent their nations, and therefore are entitled to be an equal member of the
United Nations. However, governments like the Islamic Republic of Iran do not
represent their respective nations. Nonetheless, they use their status as a
member to distort the truth and demands what they want.
Since the Advent of Islamic Republic in Iran, the Baloch people in the
south-eastern province of Sistan and Balochistan have been oppressed through
security, military, political, economic and cultural means. Contrary to the
international law, the whole border area of Iran and Pakistan has been mined.
Hundreds of innocent people have been killed by these mines. Unlawful, and
inhumane discrimination and prejudice against the ethnic Baloch people are
rampant in every aspect of life such as housing, education, health, employment
and so forth. The province is the most deprived province in Iran. Although the
share of the province population is about 3.5% of the total Iranian population,
the allocated annual budget to the province is just over one thousandth (1/1000)
of the total national budgets. Disease, hunger, illiteracy, poverty and
inequality are widespread in the Province. Religious discrimination against
Baloch people is an unpalatable fact of life. The Baloch are Sunni while the
regime promotes fanatic Shiism.
The Iranian Intelligent and security forces crush even minimal protest and
civilised objection to the status quo in Balochistan mercilessly. You must
realise that what goes in Tehran and reflected in the Media is different from
that in Balochistan where the Authorities tolerate no dissent, and has total
control over all means of communication. The Iranian government has dispatched
tens of thousands of troops to the province. According to the Iranian official
news agencies, more than 65 Baloch people have been hanged on various charges
during the last five months. According to independent sources the actual number
is close to 100 hanged. Many of these victims were innocent or political
dissidents.
Islamic Republic of Iran’s use of brute violence in dealing with opponents in
Balochistan has created an environment where violence, murder, hanging, killings
and use of savage force have become the norm. No body in Balochistan can
advocate violence simply because the Baloch people are the prime victim of
violence. Unfortunately, it is against the background of state-sponsored
violence that some Baloch have resorted to violence.
As a fundamental point of principle we do subscribe to the notion that no cause
can justify the use of terrorist violence. However, condemning unilaterally only
one side of the violence without any reference to the perpetual violence
committed by the government forces is neither equitable nor it serves any
constructive purpose, but to the appeasement of a regime that has been condemned
time after time by the United Nations Human Rights Committee and other relevant
UN bodies and international human rights organisations.
The Islamic Republic of Iran has closed all civil and peaceful avenues for
dialogue, complaint or dissent in Balochistan. It is therefore responsible for
creating an environment where armed conflict, violence and murder are
perpetuated by further violence, killings and savagery. The question is: who
created and strives to maintain this venomous and vicious cycle of violence and
death in Balochistan? In your statement, sadly there is no reference to the
violence being committed by the government’s security forces. It does not
mention hanging of scores of opponents, not does it refer to the suffering of
Baloch people. This is a selective and one-sided statement that fails to condemn
terrorism in its all forms and shapes. This is a sad statement which in effect
says violence and terrorism is condemned provided the perpetrators are not
associated or part of an apparatus which belong to one of our member state.
The Security Council should not be selective in its approach towards condemning
terrorism and violence. We will be privileged to hear from you as to why the
Security Council has failed to be thorough and imposing in its stance on
terrorism with regards to SC/8957?
Could you please be kind enough to distribute our letter to all 15 members of
the Council?
I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely
AbdulSattarDoshoki
Dr A. Doshoki
On behalf of
Balochistan United Front of Iran
CC: His Excellency Mr Ban Ki-moon
Secretary-General
United Nations
Ambassadors to the Security Councils