حزب مردم بلوچستان  Balochistan People’s Party  بلوچستانءِ اُستمانءِ گــَل

 

 

A dangerous place

As military operations continue with the aim to eliminate Baloch rebels or force them to surrender, there is no hope of restarting political dialogue to peacefully resolve the problems afflicting Balochistan

16-07-2006
By Rahimullah Yusufzai; http://jang.com.pk



There was a sudden increase in violence in Balochistan recently with the government routinely making claims about killing scores of ‘miscreants’, or ‘terrorists’, as the local press is required to describe the nationalist Baloch combatants. Increasingly, it was also being claimed that a growing number of Bugti Baloch fighters were abandoning their chief Nawab Mohammad Akbar Khan Bugti and surrendering their weapons to be on the side of the government.

However, the government’s claims about successes on the battlefield haven’t led to an end to attacks against the security forces. There certainly was a slight drop in acts of sabotage but the armed forces, particularly the paramilitary Frontier Corps, continued to face attacks not only in Dera-Bugti and Kohlu districts but also elsewhere in Balochistan. Landmines planted by insurgents were taking toll of soldiers and remained a big worry for the troops. There was no respite also from rocket attacks and bomb explosions targeting gas installations, electricity lines and railway tracks.

Balochistan is still a dangerous place and would remain so until the root-causes of the insurgency are tackled. As military operations continued with the aim to eliminate Baloch rebels or force them to surrender, there was no hope of restarting political dialogue to peacefully resolve the problems afflicting the province. In the circumstances, it was obvious that no durable solution of the conflict was in sight, at least in the foreseeable future.

For the second time in the recent past, government officials claimed that Akbar Bugti, the 79-year old head of the Bugti tribe, had left his native Dera-Bugti and shifted to Kahan in Kohlu district, the abode of the equally rebellious Marri Baloch tribal people. Dera-Bugti’s district coordination officer, Abdul Samad Lasi, was quoted by the press as claiming that the Bugti tribal chief was no longer present in his mountain hideout where he had moved several months ago after his fort-like home in Dera-Bugti town came under military attack. Lasi’s first claim about the departure of Akbar Bugti from his native area had proved incorrect and it remains to be seen if he is right this time. Being a government official and often accused of making tall claims, Lasi would have to provide evidence to restore his credibility and prove his new claim about Akbar Bugti’s escape to Kohlu.

Lasi, along with Raziq Bugti, an official spokesman and adviser to Balochistan chief minister Jam Mohammad Yousaf, and the provincial police chief Chaudhry Mohammad Yaqoob, usually brief the press about the security situation in the province and the arrests and deaths that occur during searches and raids by law-enforcing agencies. Akbar Bugti himself or his son-in-law Senator Agha Shahid Bugti, who is an office-bearer of Jamhoori Watan Party, tell their side of the story to the reporters. Then there is Azad Baloch, who claims to speak for the shadowy Balochistan Liberation Army, Wadera Alam Khan representing the Bugti tribal chief, and others using fake names who regularly contact Quetta journalists to challenge government claims and give their version of events. One has to be careful while drawing conclusions from the usually unverified claims made by official spokesmen and those speaking on behalf of the Baloch combatants.

As expected, Akbar Bugti’s lieutenants denied the government claim and insisted that he was still present in his native area and was leading his Bugti fighters in the fight against security forces. Their denial is understandable given the belief that the departure of the Bugti tribal head from the area would demoralise his men and weaken their resistance to security forces. It is also pertinent to mention that government officials in the past even made the unbelievable claim that Akbar Bugti had fled to Iran. Such claims, it seems, are made to belittle him and cause demoralisation among Bugtis loyal to their chief.

Even if he eventually leaves Dera-Bugti, which is possible in view of the aerial strikes by gunship helicopters against rebel hideouts in the Sangsila mountainous area where he is reportedly holed up, there is no possibility that the Bugti tribal chief would give up the fight. He is too proud a man to accept defeat. Rather, he would want to die fighting and be remembered as a martyr to the Baloch cause. Besides, the authorities apparently have no intention at this stage of the crisis to eliminate or capture Akbar Bugti.

The stepped-up military activity in both Dera-Bugti and Kohlu might have enabled the security forces to score some successes against Baloch combatants but it has at the same time damaged the government’s credibility. The use of Cobra gunship helicopters and other sophisticated weapons in such actions and government claims about killing scores of alleged terrorists has given a lie to oft-repeated official assertions that no military operations were being conducted in Balochistan. By admitting the use of gunship helicopters and making claims about killing, say, 23 Baloch ‘miscreants’ in attacks on ‘farrari’ camps for fugitives in Sangsila and Bhambore areas in Dera-Bugti on July 9, the government has finally conceded that an elaborate military operation was on to defeat a full-blown insurgency in parts of the province.

The fact that ‘farrari’ camps providing military training to militants are present, as claimed by the Balochistan police chief, in distant places such as Chaghai, Kalat and Bolan districts and attacks have taken place from Loralai in the north of Balochistan to Gwadar in the south shows the spread of the insurgency. Other serious developments include the killing of government employees, so-called informers and Punjabi settlers, attacks against pro-Islamabad politicians, and assaults on foreign-funded projects and foreigners, including Chinese.

A dangerous new element was added to the already explosive situation when the government brought back the Kalpar Bugtis, who have been challenging Akbar Bugti, to Dera-Bugti for resettlement. Marri tribesmen opposed to Nawab Khair Bakhsh Marri were also enabled to return to Kohlu. This set up the stage for bloody confrontation within the two large Baloch tribes and many lives have already been lost in the inter-tribal feuds.

The seriousness of the situation could be gauged from recent interviews and statements of Balochistan’s former chief minister Sardar Attaullah Mengal. Despite his old age and failing health, he remains relevant to the volatile politics of the province and is at the same time a forceful voice for the rights of Pakistan’s smaller nationalities from the platform of the Pakistan Oppressed Nations Movement (PONM). Unlike Akbar Bugti and Nawab Khair Bakhsh Marri, he hasn’t called upon his fellow tribesmen or followers to take up arms against the government. But he has publicly voiced support for all those fighting the Pakistani state in defence of the ‘Baloch homeland and culture’ and described those laying down their lives for this cause as martyrs. He is also on record saying that Pakistan and Balochistan could no longer co-exist. In his view, the situation in Balochistan has gone to a point of no-return and there was no reason to trust President General Pervez Musharraf after he went back on his promise to the ‘MMA Mullahs’ to quit as Army chief in return for their support for the 17th constitutional amendment. He also wants all settlers in Balochistan, particularly the Punjabis, to express solidarity with the Baloch cause or simply leave Balochistan.

Opinions have hardened on both sides if one were to remember the language used by government functionaries, including President Musharraf, against the rebel Baloch sardars. There have been reports about young Baloch university graduates joining the ranks of the militants and getting killed or arrested. The younger generation of Baloch, particularly from the affected tribes and districts, appear to be sliding toward militancy and losing hopes in a federal Pakistan. The military operations and setting up of new garrisons in Balochistan might bring a semblance of normalcy to parts of the province and protect gas and other precious installations but it would be no more than a short-term solution of the festering problem. Imposing solutions on a largely unhappy Baloch population would not work in the long run and instability would elude Pakistan’s largest and resource-rich province.