|
Pakistan & Iran to join hands
against Baloch
09.08.2006
By: Dr Jumma Khan Marri
The very essence of leadership is that
you have to have a vision.
There are no secrets that both countries illegally occupy and ruthlessly
use all their state power to humiliate and plunder Balochistan and Baloch
national resources, this is not first time these two giant countries join
their hands against a small and sparsely populated people Baloch know very
well why these two countries want to fight a common enemy, because without
Balochistan these countries has no future and Balochistan with her vast
coast and resources is vital for their survival, but they made it clear to
Baloch many times that they do not need Baloch people but their lands.
It is perfectly good time for Baloch people from both east and west to put
aside their differences and make a united front against these two tyrant
states who use every slogan to subdue Baloch people and ruthlessly plunder
their natural resources to buy more lethal weapons to continue there
genocide of Baloch people.
Baloch people should look around the world for interested countries that
has no territorial ambitions and can help Baloch liberate there home lands
for long term economical and geostrategicall alliances.
Baloch Diaspora around the world must give up their selfishness and open
their hearts for their brethren who are struggling for a common aim to get
a name and a country for Baloch under the heaven Balochistan has every
thing to get great and rich country as we have all resources’ and good
educated people who could run the Baloch country for a better future.
Baloch has no future what so ever under Iranian and Pakistani tyranny they
will always treat us like dogs we must fight with our nails and tooth to
get the freedom as the people of Palestine do against all western imperial
powers with their artificial stogie state of Israel.
The way Vietnamese fought and the way small nation like Palestine fights,
if we fight only one third of their determination we would be a free
country long before unlike theirs our enemies are cowards rabbits who will
run away if they see us united, unfortunately Baloch themselves and their
leadership in particular are short minded and incapable for a vision that
could lead Baloch to a united front.
Those Baloch who are siding with the enemy must know that they are digging
their graves with their own hands and the enemy who is offering them roses
today will push them in their own dug graves.
Those Baloch who are collecting soft pillow under their elbows and
chatting with army generals must know and open their eyes and look at
history which is full of fresh examples, the same generals Humiliated Mr
Nawaz Sheriff and removed him from power the same generals had good times
with Nawab Bugti when he sided with them against Baloch in 70s today these
generals have ruthlessly betrayed him and hunting for him all over
Balochistan.
Baloch leadership without a vision is like lost sheep in jungle and could
easily be trapped by enemy as the sheep by low laying tiger.
http://balochunity.org/index.php?facts+&did=3455
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Turkey sees it can't stop
'independent Kurdistan,' says US advisor to Kurds
August 23, 2006
Galbraith urges Washington to re deploy forces in Kurd-controlled northern
Iraq
WASHINGTON - Turkish Daily
News
Turkey cannot stop the formal creation of an independent Kurdish state in
northern Iraq and is beginning to understand this reality, a top U.S.
adviser to Iraqi Kurdish leaders said.
Peter Galbraith, a former U.S. ambassador to Zagreb, also urged Washington
to redeploy the American army to "Kurdistan," withdrawing from the rest of
war-torn Iraq. He said there was nothing the United States could do to put
an end to the country's ongoing "civil war" or to reunite Iraq.
"I don't advocate the breaking up of Iraq. It has already disintegrated,"
Galbraith said Monday in an address to the Middle East Institute, a think
tank here. "I haven't met a single Kurd who would say 'I prefer to live in
Iraq' rather than in an independent Kurdistan. There's no chance to
persuade the Kurds to give up their independence."
He said the Kurdish entity
in northern Iraq already has been de facto independent, only lacking a
seat at the United Nations, and that winning formal independence was just
a matter of time.
President George W. Bush told a news conference here Monday that his
government would continue to work for a united Iraq and opposed calls for
the country's break-up.
Asked to comment on Ankara's position on an independent Kurdish state,
Galbraith said: "Turkey has long viewed anything Kurdish as an anathema, a
threat to its national integrity, but that attitude is changing. Now
there's a significant body of opinion that basically adopts a different
approach."
He said that this new understanding developing in Turkey, which partly
stemmed from European Union-related political reforms, acknowledged that
invading northern Iraq was not an option, because this would involve huge
political and military problems.
Galbraith said that those Turks with this new understanding knew that any
Turkish move to invade northern Iraq would alienate the United States and
make sure that Turkey would be forced to stay "out of the European Union
for the rest of this century."
"So I think the basic argument is that Turkey doesn't have an alternative,
doesn't have a way to stop the emergence of an independent Kurdistan. That
being the case, what's the best strategy for Turkey? The best strategy is
good relations with Kurdistan, and that's actually what is happening on
the ground," Galbraith said, calling this attitude "a realistic approach."
He did not directly
specify which groups or agencies in Turkey had adopted this new
understanding toward a Kurdish state but said: "Turkey is by far the
largest investor in Iraqi Kurdistan. The Turkish government has promoted
investments in Kurdistan." Galbraith is an advisor to both Massoud Barzani,
leader of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and head of the Kurdish
regional government in northern Iraq, and Iraqi President Jalal Talabani,
also leader of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK). But sources say he
is closer to Barzani. He was in Iraq in the wake of the 2003 war and
during last year's negotiations for a constitution.
Galbraith suggested that the U.S. Army pull back from Baghdad and Iraq's
central parts, scene of a simultaneous Sunni Arab insurgency and
Shiite-Sunni sectarian fighting, and the Shiite-controlled south and
instead redeploy in Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq.
Asked if the Kurds wanted the creation of a greater Kurdistan uniting the
Kurds of Iraq, Turkey, Iran and Syria and how Turkey's Kurds would behave,
he said that Turkey's Kurdish problem was largely a civil rights issue.
"Most Turkish Kurds see
that they're better off staying in a Turkey moving toward the European
Union" rather than seeking alternatives, he said.
Galbraith said the Iraqi Kurds were not interested in a greater Kurdistan
because this would make them a minority in such an entity, like in the
case of "a merger of Moldova and Romania."
Asked to comment on Kurdish efforts to win full control of northern Iraq's
multiethnic city of Kirkuk which sits on 40 percent of the country's oil
reserves, he said that "the Kirkuk issue has already been settled" through
a constitutional provision that calls for a referendum in the area before
the end of 2007.
Turkey and a number of
international experts have been warning that such a referendum, which
would favor the Kurds amid an ongoing Kurdish exodus that is altering the
city's demographic structure, would not be legitimate, but Galbraith said,
"You can't make everybody happy
|